Archive for June, 2011
Review: Venus (Steppenwolf Theatre)
Heightened theatrics, linguistic acrobatics detract from heightened tale
| Steppenwolf Theatre presents |
| Venus |
| Written by Suzan-Lori Parks Directed by Jess McLeod at Steppenwolf Garage Theatre, 1624 N. Halsted (map) through June 19 | tickets: $20 (all 3 for $45) | more info |
Reviewed by Catey Sullivan
Look at the set of Suzan-Lori Parks’ Venus and you can see the all-but unthinkable humiliation of its titular heroine embodied in designers Scott Davis and Emily Tarleton’s creepy vision of a 19th century doctor’s laboratory. The room is filled with jars of pickled organs, the results of post-mortem dissections and “macerations” – the process of letting flesh putrefy so that the bones beneath it can be measured accurately.
The preserved specimens include the organs of Saartjie Baartman, a young woman taken from South Africa in 1810 and put on display throughout Europe as a sideshow attraction. Throngs of Anglos paid to see the “Venus Hottentot,” billed as a “wild female jungle creature” of the “Dark Continent.” Saartjie was displayed in an iron cage, and marketed with breathless, sensationalism as a monstrous display of
grotesque femininity (an early example of the hypersexualization of dark-skinned women that continues to the present day). People were urged to queue up for a chance to fondle the Hottentot’s “great heathen buttocks” , said to be so freakishly large they rated comparison with a hot air balloon. Throughout Europe, men and women alike bought tickets to gape at Baartman’s labia minora, which were said to dangle like monstrous turkey wattles.
After Baartman died, her body was dissected, her organs measured and displayed in a French museum. Even in death there was no dignity for Baartman: Post-mortem, the most private of her private parts were still on display. In the Steppenwolf Garage Theatre staging, Baartman shares a stage with the remnants of her own body, creating a portrait of a woman who suffered the ultimate objectification. If much of today’s pornography dehumanizes women by reducing them to airbrushed images of body parts (and much pornography does exactly that), the reduction of Saartjie Baartman went far further by depriving her even of a face. She became, ultimately, a collection of parts in jars.
History has somewhat restored Baartman’s personhood. Her life is the subject of at least three plays, Parks’ being one of the earliest. Unfortunately – and despite that marvelous set and several fine performances – Parks’ play obscures the vivid, enraging heart of Baartman’s story. Baartman’s is an amazing, inherently dramatic and historically important tale that needs no heightened theatrics or linguistic acrobatics. Yet Parks weighs it down with plenty of both. In doing so, the playwright detracts from her subject’s humanity.
Directed by Jess McLeod, Venus begins with a confusing kaleidoscope of words and movement which does little to establish any kind of meaningful foundation for what’s to come. A “Negro Resurrectionist” (Michael Pogue) in contemporary dress shines a flashlight through the dusky, 1810 doctor’s laboratory, eventually discovering (or perhaps awaking? It isn’t clear.) an alabaster-white chorus of two (Ann Sonneville and John Stokvis), The Baron Docteur (Jeff Parker) and Venus herself (Mildred Marie Langford). During this hallucinogenic Night at the Museum pastiche, the audience also meets a sixth character, (Carolyn Hoerdemann), an androgynous, ominous person whose role isn’t immediately apparent. As preludes go, the percussive, stylized movements and poetry-slam style verbiage may well leave you wishing that Parks would just get to the point.
And so she does, sort of. When Parks sticks with a straight-forward dialogue and simply shows what happened to Baartman, Venus is strong stuff. Langford continues a stellar season (she did deeply moving work with in TimeLine’s In Darfur earlier this year), instilling Miss Saartjie Baartman with a sweetness and a humanity that makes her plight all the more heartbreaking. In an early scene when Baartman is lured to London, Langford displays the starry-eyed hope of a young woman promised riches – Baartman was a slave, which made the promise of financial freedom all the more tantalizing – for merely working as a “dancer” for two years overseas.
If anything, Parks downplays what happened next. On exhibit, Baartman was forced to squat naked in her cage, and display her genitals for endless crowds of people. The “dancing” involved stripping and shaking her buttocks while onlookers spat, or worse, at her. And although Britain outlawed slave trade in 1807, Baartman was kept as a slave. After London grew bored with her, she was purchased by a French animal trainer. When the French grew tired of her, she became a prostitute. Within five years of her arrival in London, she was dead, reportedly of syphilis. Parks glosses over much of this, instead spending much of the play showing a dysfunctional but not joy-free love story between Baartman and The Baron Docteur, who claimed to love her even as he planned to dissect her.
It’s always clear that the relationship is horribly unequal, but in Parks’ telling Baartman actually seems relatively happy in it. Instead of addressing the almost unthinkable sexual humiliation Baartman was subjected to, Parks presents a rather meaningless (meaningless because it’s never really explained) scene where the Docteur masturbates with his back to Baartman while urging her to do likewise. Thus does the Docteur seem kinky, unkind and entitled, and the relationship woefully unbalanced in terms of power. Such relationships are unpleasant, but they’re not the stuff of sexual slavery or soul-annihilating humiliation.
The largest problem here is that Parks’ Venus presents Baartman’s story from a safe distance. The ghostly chorus of two, the choreographed blocking, the rhythmic sing-song dialogue – all these things work to present a slightly abstract and somewhat prettified narrative. That ‘s an ill fit for the story of Saartjie Baartman.
| Rating: ★★½ |
|
All photos by Michael Brosilow |
Review: Bonegrinders (Bendsinister Theatre)
An authentic, yet not wholly theatrical new play
|
BENDSINISTER Theatre presents |
| Bonegrinders |
|
Written by Melody Von Smith |
Reviewed by Jason Rost
While their name is up for debate, BENDSINISTER Theatre is a company packed with potential. The exact same can be said for the title and script of their latest production, Bonegrinders by Melody Von Smith, an environmental chemist and journalist by day. As you enter the RBP Rorschach space, set designer Noel Dominique has created an incredibly authentic looking bar. It’s so real, that you can purchase drinks from the bartender before the start of the show. It’s this authenticity that Von Smith and director Juan Castaneda excel at. However, getting the look and feel of a setting is not enough to make for a good theatrical outing. With such attention to realism, there is very little in terms of theatricality that merits this script being a play instead of a screenplay or television script.
Von Smith certainly has something with this script, but in its current state it lacks consistency. The theme of coming home from war and being unable to adjust to daily life has been told countless times, i.e. The Hurt Locker. The difference in Von Smith’s script is that instead of dealing with enlisted men and women, it deals with war journalists, but that difference is a fine line according to Von Smith.
Bendsinister’s Bonegrinders takes place entirely inside a typical neighborhood bar in Buffalo, NY. The story revolves around Sadie (played with great emotional capacity by Erin Elizabeth Orr), who has been recently widowed after her husband Lloyd, an embedded war journalist, was killed while working in the Middle East. The play opens when Sadie receives a letter from Lloyd, sent before he was killed, the day before his funeral. Her friends gather around her and attempt to comfort and advise her as she struggles to decide whether or not to open the letter. Further conflict arises when Lloyd’s best friend, Riley (Adam Dodds), a vigilante war photographer himself, returns for the funeral. A chaotic, at times muddled, mixture of anger, grief, and alcohol create a tumultuous atmosphere as events unfold and occasional truths are revealed.
Von Smith’s structure is where the play falters. The emphasis on giving each character their own storyline ultimately detracts from the central conflict. It appears to be a symptom of mimicking television episodic structure. The setting, characters and dialogue are exceptionally realistic. She has clearly given great thought and care to birthing each of these characters. Conversely, since we don’t have a 13-episode television series, and rather a two-hour play, you simply cannot stop the story immediately at hand from moving forward. If this were a play about “a bar” where different stories and different people enter and exit, then that might work. However, what we have is a play about a dead war journalist, his wife and his best friend. Taking detours to explore Devin’s (Greg Wenz) relationship with his father or Phil’s (Arch Harmon) restaurant business is superfluous and lessens the emotional impact of the primary narrative.
The insights we gain on the life of a war journalist or photographer is minimal. It’s nothing that could not be discovered after ten-minutes of googling the subject matter. Also, while Mike Cherry, Orr and Wenz give thoughtful performances, the cast on a whole is uneven. Dodd’s emotional outbursts are often contrived and strained. Harmon is a good presence to the mix, but is unfortunately very difficult to understand at times as he recites his lines by rote. Castaneda gets the atmosphere and naturalism perfectly, but fails at helping Von Smith’s script out by not shaping and building it through pacing.
Von Smith is a playwright to watch, as is Bendsinister Theatre as a new company. Bonegrinders, while ambitious, just doesn’t hit the emotional heights it aims for and divulges very little information about the world of war journalism. It lands into soap-opera territory too often. If she would allow her supporting characters to, well, support…that focus would be a start at allowing her central characters to communicate the political, human and social depth she hints at currently.
| Rating: ★★½ |
BENDSINISTER Theatre presents the Midwest premiere of Bonegrinders, continuing through June 18th at the RBP Rorschach. Performances are Thursday through Saturday at 8 PM, and Sunday at 6 PM. A $15 donation for entry is requested. Performances are BYOB, with concessions available. Seats can be reserved by email at tickets@bendsinister.org or by phone at 773-234-2363. More information can be found at bendsinister.org
More info on Von Smith and the initial production of Bonegrinders: http://www.buffaloathome.com/detail.aspx?dct=54&id=6520&mid=240&loc=rss
Review: Theophilus North (Organic Theater)
Wilder’s final novel enchantingly dramatized
|
Organic Theater Company presents |
| Theophilus North |
| Written by Matthew Burnett Based on the book by Thornton Wilder Directed by Alexander Gelman at Greenhouse Theater Center, 2257 N. Lincoln (map) through June 26 | tickets: $29 | more info |
Reviewed by Jason Rost
I, Theophilus North, quit my job!
This is the line we hear from the title character in Matthew Burnett’s marvelous dramatization of Thornton Wilder’s 1973 novel, “Theophilus North”. Many of us can relate to the liberation of quitting a job, be it in actuality or daydreams. Bryan Wakefield, as Mr. North, describes the feeling perfectly, “I feel like I’ve been released from a hospital after a protracted illness.” The story is in many ways autobiographical for Mr. Wilder. Mr. North hails from the great state of Wisconsin, as did Wilder. They both developed a desire to travel the world, something that Wilder did, only to realize later that the world exists wherever you are, not in some far exotic land. This is a
theme found in Wilder’s Our Town as well as Theophilus North. However, the character of Theophilus North comes to this conclusion by staying put while Wilder himself did travel the globe to find that the cosmic reaches of the universe can exist within a small New England town just easily as Paris or a tropical island. Director Alexander Gelman’s production with Organic Theater Company is whimsically minimal and strikes all the nuances of Wilder’s tale with great wit and charm.
Instead of Grovers Corners, Theophilus North finds himself in Newport, RI. It’s meant to be a brief pit stop to make some extra money to travel the world with his newfound freedom. He states, “I find myself like Columbus, seeking funds in Ferdinand’s court before the great voyage.” He takes up a job as a tennis coach in town, despite having no experience in tennis. However, he meets his first student, Eloise Fenwick (another delightful performance from Kristina Cottone in rep with her role in The Naked King). She takes a liking to Mr. North despite his failed tennis skills and gets him a job teaching French to her pretentious brother, Charles (Colin Jackson). This leads to a string of jobs in which Mr. North finds himself deeply involved in certain upper class townspeople’s personal affairs through no attempt of his own to meddle.
He finds a job reading literature to a philistine woman (a multifaceted performance by Philena Gilmer) and unlocks her love of books, all the while teaching her philandering husband a lesson in marital appreciation through Shakespeare. North goes on to save a doomed marriage based on young lust from taking place. On top of all this, he teaches an old man (Ryan Massie) that he still has some life in him despite the claims of his daughter already counting her inheritance. After developing these relationships and learning the intimate details of the people of Newport, North comes to the realization that he is a part of the world there as much as anywhere. Perhaps what is most impressive about Burnett’s script is how quickly you forget that the lines are written by Burnett rather than Wilder himself. It’s a true excavation of the literary great.
Bryan Wakefield’s performance is brimming with confidence and restraint. North’s attachment to Newport is gradual; we can see the subtle shifts as Wakefield grows closer to these flawed yet lovely people. While the rest of this cast fills in the supporting roles eloquently, I couldn’t help but imagine how much more resonant the piece would play if there were a diversity in age throughout the cast. The twenty-some actor Ryan Massie impressively embodies the movement and mannerisms of Dr. Bosworth, but there’s a level missing when the role lacks the presence of an actor over 60. It’s not enough to take away from the production on a whole, or distract, it’s just enough to make you wonder how much greater of an emotional effect the play could garner with a few older actors in the mix.
Despite a degree of missed depth in age-blind casting, Wilder and Burnett’s story gets told most refreshingly. Melanie Parks’ costumes truly exhibit spring of 1926. They help differentiate the classes of characters very well, and the white/beige color scheme fits the era and the light nostalgia of the story exquisitely. This lovely Organic production merits an outing, especially for Wilder fans, to see this scarce-produced dramatization about discovering the world and adventure in the places and people around you.
| Rating: ★★★ |
Theophilus North plays in rep with The Naked King (our review) at the Greenhouse Theater, 2257 N. Lincoln Ave (map), through June 26. Performances are Thursday thru Saturday at 8 pm, Saturday matinees at 3pm, Sundays at 3 pm. Tickets are $29. Running time is 2 hours, 20 minutes with one intermission. For tickets, call 773-404-7336 or visit www.organictheater.org.
Review: See You in the Mourning (Naked Theatre Chicago)
Naked Theatre’s inaugural production shows it’s a company to watch
| Naked Theatre Chicago presents |
| See You in the Mourning |
| Written by Bill Zimmerman Co-directed by Burtney, Hedden, Tucker and Zimmerman at Charnel House, 3421 W. Fullerton (map) through June 18 | tickets: $10-$15 | more info |
Reviewed by Dan Jakes
The only real difference between a reunion and a wake is the presence of a corpse.
The rest is more or less the same: forced small talk filled with updates and pleasantries, hastily-pressed dress shirts, inappropriate laughter, boredom, shame, and pot luck dishes. Most notably, visitors of either come to the same sudden and off-putting realization of how much time has gone by since the last gathering with the same crowd. Bill Zimmerman capitalizes on the old "why do we only see each other when someone dies?" sentiment in his new play about four siblings who do just that.
Half of Naked Theatre’s collaborative premiere presentation is devoted to the interfamilial squabbles of the Winters–two brothers and two sisters who’s common language is passive-aggression and smarmy quips. Zimmerman and company go to great lengths to draw divisive lines between the siblings. Save for similar ages and shared parents (for the most part, anyway–there‘s the requisite adopted child), the four young adults have little in common. An uptight gay man clashes with his aggression-prone bro; sister and sister have Odd Couple-style conflicting outlooks on responsibility. The cross-section continues likewise. With each progressing aunt and grandparent that goes toes-up, a new point of contention is curtly whispered among the clan from the back pews.
Family dysfunction has had a cozy home in the American theater. While not illuminating much new about blood-relative dynamics, the young ensemble members (Natalie Burtney, Bethany Hedden, Christopher L. Tucker, and Bill Zimmerman, all hailing from the same Wayne State theater program) share an unmistakable rapport not unlike an extended family. Rare bonding moments read as genuine. That too goes for the script: sentiments like a sister’s desire to pray-the-gay-out of her brother are at once condescending and deeply compassionate, and unspoken feelings of alienation are played out with realistic nuance.
The other, more sophisticated half lightly satirizes the counterintuitive conventions of the wake and funeral processes. Anyone who’s experienced the death of an immediate family member can identify with the portrayed Kafka-esque parade of hugs and handshakes you have to endure when–emotionally battered and confused–you’d rather be alone and not have to play nice with anyone. Same goes for glue-sticking last minute collages, picking music (everyone fancies unconventional upbeat ambiance, evidently unaware that no one is in the mood for “Here Comes the Sun” while weeping in a church), or assuming a particularly old and distant relative was dead in the first place. Rigid formatting and decent storytelling suggests Naked Theatre is getting its bearings–See You in the Mourning’s inspired ending suggests it’s a company to watch.
| Rating: ★★½ |
| photo: Ecstatic Photography |
Naked Theatre’s See You in the Mourning continues through June 18th, with performances Thursdays-Saturdays at 8pm at Chicago’s Charnel House, 3421 W. Fullerton (map). Tickets are $20 ($15 for industry and students), and can be purchased online at brown paper tickets. For more information, visit the production’s Facebook page.
Review: The Naked King (Organic Theater Chicago)
Children’s theatre fluff not yet matured
|
Organic Theater Company Presents |
|
The Naked King |
| Written by Yevgeni Schwartz Directed by Alexander Gelman at the Greenhouse Theater Center, 2257 N. Lincoln (map) through June 26 | tickets: $29 | more info |
Reviewed by Jason Rost
The idea of running a repertory company can provide several theatrical benefits, as it does in many European theaters. It allows the audience to see the same actors in different roles, gaining an appreciation for the craft, as well as allowing the ensemble to build strong chemistry. However, the key to making this work, and to maintain versatility in casting, is to have variety in your ensemble. With Organic Theater Company’s production of The Naked King, we instead get a cast of almost entirely white males in their 20’s. Throughout the production, there are several roles that would benefit from diversity in age and sex to add some depth to this fluff which the company surely is striving to do. For instance, while the male-in-drag characters are moderately funny, it’s not necessary to have each ‘lady in waiting’ played by a male actor. Actually, it’s funnier simply by juxtaposition if two are women and only one is a man in a dress.
Another symptom of a rotating repertory is that one show can come off noticeably more polished and rehearsed than the other. Playing in tandem with the delightful adaptation of Thornton Wilder’s Theophilus North, this cocktail of three Hans Christian Andersen tales in The Naked King is clearly a few steps behind. However, there are certainly moments of pure fun and humor in Russian playwright Yevgeni Schwartz’ 1930’s adaptation that Organic hits. It may just be that a few of the jokes have gotten lost, or lost their edge, in the adaptation from Russian to English. The stories chosen by Schwartz to intertwine are, “The Swineherd,” “The Princess and the Pea” and “The Emperor’s New Clothes.”
The play opens with our swineherd, Henrik (Jonathan Franklin) and his faithful sidekick Christian (Michael Kim Lewis). Henrik lures a clueless princess he has fallen in love with, Henrietta (a very talented Kristina Cottone, doing a lot with the stereotypical ingénue role), to his farm with the promise of a magic kettle. She naturally falls in love with the amorous young lad, even though they are from different classes. It’s the same old story, as her father, the king (Richard L. Gross) forbids their love and the kids run off. As the other plots of the fairy tales are encountered, they do more to muddle the plot than enhance it. However, there are funny bits throughout; especially Henrietta’s scripted insults Henrik gives her to dissuade another king from falling in love with her, in somewhat of a reverse-Cyrano situation.
Alexander Gelman’s staging helps keep the action afloat, utilizing every possible exit of the Greenhouse space to its full comedic potential. The examination of the weavers’ magical clothing is especially notable in one of the funniest physical scenes of the night involving invisible/non-existent clothing. The actors encountered a few hiccups in timing and fumbling of lines at the performance I attended. This is not to say this cast isn’t incredibly talented. Ryan Massie exhibits wonderful comedic timing, proving to possess the most innate ability to transform from character to character, including the king’s poet. The moments the performances fall flat may be a symptom of the repertory format. In Europe, casts will rehearse the plays for 6 months in this style of producing theatre. I can’t be sure, but The Naked King came off under-rehearsed in the end. Scenic designer Terrence McClellan’s 90’s neon-colored fun house frames are functionally smart, but the aesthetic lends itself to making the production more juvenile.
I can understand the attraction to doing this script as a group of artists. It has an immense possibility for fun, movement and freedom with familiar characters. Nevertheless, the script itself seems to have been too easy for this company as they tried to enhance it deeper than what exist on the page. The production wants to be an insightful look at these fairy-tales from our youth through adult eyes, but instead it comes off as a bunch of grown-ups running around acting like children with just a small handful of more ‘adult’ moments. Any one of the three individual stories shortened for a youth audience would be more effective. Schwartz’ collection is a constant hit-or-miss hodgepodge of tales that have seen much more wondrous adaptations on their own.
| Rating: ★★½ |
Organic Theater Company’s The Naked King continues through June 26th, with performances Thursday through Saturday at 8PM, with 3PM matinees on both Saturday and Sunday. Performances are located at the Greenhouse Theater Center, 2257 N. Lincoln (map). Tickets are $29 for each show. For more information visit: www.organictheater.org.

